Monday, 25 February 2013

Hyderabad Intelligence Disaster

Hyderabad intelligence disaster
By Subhash Chopra
The combined failure of national and state intelligence agencies in preventing Hyderabad blasts that cost  16 lives besides injuries to over 90 people is not just a one-off  example . It is a  clear pointer to a systemic  failure which  leaves  ordinary citizens exposed to danger again and again. Hyderabad has  not been targeted for the first time. It has suffered several  times earlier. The hanging  of Afzal Guru, the parliament  attack convict,  had clearly  made cities like  Hyderabad  vulnerable  targets of attack by  anti-national elements ,both home grown and foreign aided. 
The Central government  had  sounded  four alerts to Hyderabad included one eight hours before the explosions which turned Dilsukhnagar locality into “Dlidukhnagar”  on Thursday February 21. Hyderabd  did not need any Central alerts, it should have been wide awake  on its own. What were its police and intelligence officers doing  all along?  What were  the officers from the local thana policeman  to  SP and Inspector General doing?  Sleeping or enjoying the perks of their  posts?
For  Andhra Chief Minister Kiran Kumar  Reddy to claim , even after this disaster, that his state police was a ‘’role model’’ for others  defies all  sense and belief!
Unfortunately  it is not just Hyderabad  alone that suffers from this insomnia.  It is a systemic failure of epidemic  proportions from  which the entire  country  suffers. For instance only last week, the national capital region (NCR)of Delhi itself witnessed  a massive breakdown of law and order in NOIDA when hooligans infiltrated the trade unions during their bandh and set fire to cars and smashed factories and shops  The police ,as usual, arrived after the event  by which time  18 people had been injured, and 65 cars  had been damaged. Sixty  five people were arrested later but the damage was done.
 Wonder of wonders, the next day similar mob rule and destruction was witnessed in nearby  Okhla area?  Again the police and intelligence authorities were caught napping?
Mumbai 26/11,  the biggest  event of our national shame  in recent years, besides the attack on Parliament  itself,  betrays the same systemic slumber  of our intelligence officers. Instead of searching  our souls, we were too quick to blame the Americans for not  sharing  intelligence information on rogues like  David Coleman Headley ( Daood Gilani) and Taha wwur  Hussain Rana, who were jailed recently  by a US court on terror related charges  concerning  26/11 events in India and Denmark. Highly charged Indian media and political players have been crying hoarse over the betrayal by the US for not cooperating with India by holding back on information about Headley and Rana  and then adding  insult to injury by refusing to extradite  the pair of  them.
But what   about the ‘akal’ or intelligence of various Indian intelligence agencies and their functioning over the recent years leading up to the Mumbai carnage of 2008? What were these  highly paid, rarely questioned , far less answerable  than any other set of officers, doing  all this time? Enjoying all the perks and taking it easy at the poor citizen’s  cost ? Expecting America’s CIA and other agencies to do their work in the name of cooperation?
Headley(Gilani),  son of a Pakistani and an American woman and a self-confessed India -hater , visited India several times  for three years from September 2006 to July 2008. After spending his impressionable years in Pakistan following his parents’ divorce,  he joined his mother in America when he was 17.He himself is said to be thrice married and divorced, the latest from his Moroccan wife with whom he spent their honeymoon at the Taj hotel in Mumbai !
Headley(Gilani), an old school friend of  Pakistani army deserter Rana , was running  an immigration facilitation agency  (racket)  for US and Canada visa seekers  in Mumbai’s AC Market in Tardeo for all these years as a cover for  his anti-Indian activities in collusion with Lashkar-e-Tayyeba(LeT) and  his other masters  in Pakistan who unleashed the 26/11 assault on Mumbai. He set up his  dummy immigration office on a so-called licence  from Rana’s  Immigration Law Centre in Chicago. He even visited cities like Agra, Ahmedabad  and Kochi, ostensibly  to interview visa hopefuls or potential recruits for  his grand plan.
All this while he not only carried out  reconnaissance  of all the targets, including  hotels like the Taj on several  occasions, but also videographed  the places providing details to his handlers in Pakistan for  attacks on individual buildings.
Headley(Gilani) moved in and out of India all those years without raising the slightest of suspicion among the Indian intelligence operatives. Even after 26/11 he paid another visit in 2009, probably to gloat over his mission’s success!
Indian agencies bungled the intelligence supplied by the US agencies who had given  two specific tip-offs. In September 2008 the US agencies warned of a possible attack on targets in Mumbai , followed days later by another tip-off about a possible  coastal or maritime attack  India took up the second tip-off and strengthened coastline security but called off the patrols on November 20, just six days before 26/11, according to one report
Could there be a bigger bungle? What about the intelligence of these bunglers?
Hyderabad  is just one more chapter  in the long story  of  systemic failures of our disaster management.  Grandiose  authorities  with grand ranks keep sitting in headquarters and local thanas pushing  pens   but not  stirring outside where the  trouble  brews.
Shouldn’t   some  top heads roll  after all the tragedy and shameful  incompetence?
 ............................................................

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Indo-Pak dialogue must go on for the sake of silent majority on both sides



Indo-Pak  dialogue  must go on for the sake  of silent majority on both sides
By Subhash Chopra
The  Indo-Pak dialogue  which seemed to open in the New Year with promises of redeeming hopes of easy  visa regime and expanding trade  relations suddenly suffered a wobble when it got caught in the LOC crossfire  in Kashmir. The new visa regime came to a swift end moments after coming into operation. The hanging of Afzal Guru, the Indian parliament attack convict, dealt the dialogue another  blow before it had time to recover from the LOC shock. Hopes of trade and sports  ties fell by the side.

Going by the hysterical media coverage in both countries, the Indo –Pak dialogue  looked like a dead-cert  casualty. Not just  a severe jolt , the events of the  new year  had  the potential of a massive interruption of the dialogue , even a. breaking  point if one were to be led by the ‘Breaking  News’ flashes on the television channels of both countries.
Tensions erupted towards the end of the first week of the new year as five soldiers were killed in quick tit-for-tat  skirmishes  on the LOC  in Kashmir – first a Pakistani soldier shot dead, then two Indian soldiers killed with one of them beheaded and his head carried away as a ‘trophy’ , followed by two Pakistani soldiers  losing their lives.
Pakistan’s straight denial of any of their soldiers involved in the beheading  didn’t help matters, leaving the  impression that some non-state actor or elements could have done it in pursuit of their avowed aim of ‘helping their brethren across the LOC.’ On the Indian side of the LOC such acts are viewed as plain terrorist attacks, with defence chiefs openly  reserving their right to take appropriate action in defending the national interest.
Far from cooling the situation, the utterances of Pakistani foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar in television interviews  and elsewhere in the US accusing India of ‘war-mongering’ stoked further suspicions in India.
Pakistan’s call for a reference  to UN observers was met with  swift rejection by India which instead called for a bilateral flag meeting of commanders on the LOC.  Pakistan’s delayed acceptance of  holding the flag meeting prolonged the pain on both sides. But once held, the flag meeting paved the way for talks between the two  Directors  General of  Military Operations  on their ‘hot line’ – a procedure  specifically established to cool such situations. And it worked.
The situation became so bad at one stage that that the normally taciturn Indian Prime Minister  Manmohan  Singh felt  compelled to pronounce  that as long as such circumstances  prevailed “there can be no business as usual” with Pakistan. His comment was followed by President Pranab Mukherjee’s  even  tougher message  to Pakistan that  India’s hand of friendship must not be taken for granted.’’


The dialogue has taken a sever hit  but  has not been abandoned , and  it may take some time  to pick up the momentum it has lost  in this round.   It is not the first time that it has suffered such a backward pull. There have been plenty earlier  setbacks but  they have not been able to snuff it out.  The so-called trust deficit between the two countries is essentially  a bogey created by the establishment that rules Pakistan, and that too by only half of it  as the establishment itself is a divided house. There is no trust deficit between the people of India and Pakistan. And at the civil/ political  level too there is not  much of that trust deficit. Quite the contrary, there is plenty of   two-way public trust. There is  a huge peace constituency of silent majority in both countries which must  be respected and further supported. The stakes are too high to be left to saboteurs.
In fact over the last two decades political parties in the two countries have pursued the peace dialogue despite Kargil war and the 2008 Mumbai  carnage. Unfortunately  time has not been on the peacemakers’ side.
What is often forgotten is that the political leadership across major parties in both countries has from time undertaken successive initiatives to push the peace dialogue though time has not been on their side so far. The 1990 dialogue between young Prime Ministers Benazir Bhutto and Rajiv Gandhi had created all the positive wibes but Bhutto lost power  before the dialogue  could have the chance to mature. In 1999 Indian  Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee accepted the invitation of Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz  Sharif and took the peace bus to Lahore. But Pakistan army chief , General Pervez Musharraf, had other plans which resulted in the Kargil  war between the two countries. Yet in 2001 the same  General Musharraf  who engineered the Kargil war( as  revenge—by his own admission --  for India’s role in Bangladesh independence war) became a convert  to peace and came to Agra for a peace summit with Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee. But time was not on their side and the summit collapsed. Nearly five years later in 2006 Gen Musharraf   met the Indian  Prime Minister Manmohan.Singh. But time was not on the General’s  side and he got toppled from power  in 2008.
Notwitstanding huge  setbacks , including the current one set off by the skirmishes at the LOC in Kashmir and the hanging of Afzal Guru,  the ground for optimism and peace between the two countries remains solid. In spite of open and covert wars, the Indus Water
Treaty between the two countries has stood the test of time and
survived over the last 65 years. Even the 1947 ceasefire line, later
called Line of Control in Kashmir has survived in spite of open wars.
Both nations have also religiously exchanged information on nuclear
installations for the past 23 years on the first of  January every year.

Even in the current  dark  hour, the Indo-Pak dialogue remains on the table, however precarious it may look at present. . The upcoming  general elections in Pakistan and other developments there, including the possible  emergence of the new civilian and military policies on the same page,  holds out the inevitable promise of  peace and cooperation between the two nations."

Population and the Pill


Banking on unpaid ASHA  and prayer

It may be a truism to state that overpopulation is the mother of all problems, including corruption which so often hogs the limelight. Yet corruption is only a side effect of  the rising number of  claimants to the  national bread basket and some of the cookies in it.  The fierce competition for the available goodies at any stage sets of f  the  storm of corruption . The fruits of  India’s massive development  in various sectors are not enough to meet the needs of her growing population. Dis-equilibrium between the pace of  development and population growth  continues to be  the running source of all our maladies.    


  Since the middle of the 20th century India along with most parts of the world has witnessed a population explosion. Our  first family planning programmes started over  60 years ago in 1952.  Globally,  2011 witnessed the  arrival of  the seventh billion baby  with India quite in the forefront . With our  current estimate of  1.2 billion population we are still expanding faster than our development rate can cope with.

 Despite a significant slowdown over the last 20 years in  almost  half  of  the country,  India is still nowhere near a reasonably early population stabilization target. At our leisurely pace we are still looking at 2060 as the stabilization target year --  more than 100 years  after  we set up our  family planning ministry. We have missed targets several times and we could miss again if we don’t act fast.

The 1983 National Health Policy target of  achieving the total fertility rate (TFR) of  2.1 children per woman , which is also considered the replacement level, by the year 2000 was missed by a long chalk. Again the  National Population Policy target set in 2000 of achieving  2.1 TFR  by 2010 has been missed. Sadly, the   2010  TFR stands  at  2.5,  as revealed by the latest  Sample Registration System figures from  the Registrar General of  India.


The long term objective of the 2000 National Population policy was to achieve a stable (zero net growth)  stable  population  by 2045.  At  the  current rate we are pushing the stabilisation target to 2060. That need not be so. We have the medical and monetary  wherewithal  and we can shorten our target rather than wait till 2045 or for  another half century till 2060.  Our family planning strategy needs to be more focused than ever before.

For the best part of   last  40  years we have been obsessed with sterilization  --  operating upon persons who have already produced three, four or more children , when the damage is done and objective of a small family already defeated.

The birth control pill,  which is the easiest and least complicated contraceptive to use  and  which has been available worldwide for more than 50 years, has been the most popular and effective contraceptive all across Europe and other parts of the developed world.  So successful indeed that desire for a smaller family and fewer children has made couples to forego cash and holiday incentives offered by certain governments.  In countries like Germany and Russia which are witnessing negative or zero population growth  there are few takers of  such incentives  offered by the state. Even in poorer countries like  Romania and  Hungary, young couples tend to go for smaller but prosperous  families,  ignoring  traditional Catholic religious   reservations.

  But  curiously  the pill  seems to have been virtually ignored by our  planners  for  almost the  first 25 years  of  its existence. Only around 1987 ,  the pill was in some strength brought into our  basket of  the attractively named  “cafeteria”  contraceptives,  leaving it to the  consumers to pick  and choose without  telling  them to opt for one or the other . Its current usage  -- nearly three crore pills or three  lakh 30-day cycles  per year -- translates to only a little over three to four  per cent acceptors out of all  other contraceptives users.

The cafeteria approach looks good in terms of  free choice but in reality it doesn’t  play out so fair and free. The cash incentives to motivators and acceptors of  other forms of contraceptives, especially sterilisation in various forms,  act as a powerful factor  in the cafeteria.  Sterilisations can be  easily counted and monies collected by motivators and acceptors.  But pills popped in at home  can’t  be  verified and cash handouts difficult to pick.   Consequently the pill seems to have fallen off the cafeteria shelves as only about  three  percent  women in the 15-45 age group are taking to the pill,  unaware of  the advantages of the pill.

Over 90 per cent  child bearing women in India are barely aware  of  the  pill’s  benefits like regularising of  periods, bleeding control,  lesser  ovarian  problems and, above all, spacing out pregnancies for better mother and child  health.
Australian researchers at Monash  and Melbourne universities say the  pill can even cut  the risk of developing breast, ovarian and womb cancer. They even  go on to recommend the pill for nuns too for reasons of  health rather than as a conrtraceptive  because it reduces overall mortality and mortality due to ovarian and uterine cancer.
   
 In India,  medical or paramedical advice on the easy-to-use pill for controlling  family size and  better family welfare  could be most well timed and effective  after the first or second child birth.  

But where are the medical/paramedical  helpers to be found on the ground level, especially in the villages? ASHAs,  Anganwadis  and ANMs besides qualified staff at block and district hospitals make quite a nice ladder or a pyramid. But is the entire edifice adequately staffed. At the very base stands the grandly designated ASHA or  the Accredited Social Health Activist each of  whom is expected to look after 100 women in her village community. One ASHA for each village is a great idea. But what is she accredited with? Sadly in our scheme of  things under NRHM (National Rural Health Mission)  she is an unpaid worker. She is a part- time volunteer who is expected to work only two or three  hours  a day. She is our key health worker in the village. The list of her duties is a long one.  Motivating women to use contraceptives, including the pill, to help India control its runaway population growth, is only one of her myriad jobs.  All for no pay!  

The second key worker in the village is the Aanganwadi, also a part-timer with duties such as preparing mid-day school meals for school children and taking pregnant women to nearest hospitals for safe deliveries and other medical help. She at least is lucky to have some pay , a grand sum of Rs 3,000 a month announced by Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in his  2011 budget speech over a year ago.  But there was nothing for ASHA then or now in the 2012 budget.  

   
Our long obsession  with sterilisation operations  --  vasectomy, no scalpel vasectomy, tubectomy,  IUD --  in spite of the  numerical  surges running into lakhs over  the last few  years has failed to stem the explosive growth  in the Hindi heartland  of  the country.  And it must be underlined that the success of the southern states and some northern states cannot be attributed to sterilisation programmes. Rather it is due to factors like  higher female education rate, mid-day school meals, and availability of  home  entertainment  in the evening, thanks to the distribution of  free television sets by some the ruling parties.

  Sterilisations are the biggest gimmick. Collection of cash handouts  by NGOs, individual motivators and  volunteers who undergo  such operations is the main attraction of  most participants in this elaborate game. Even the medical staff  who       
perform these operations are in this somewhat  lucrative loop. All this money would be  worth  investing  if  it could move us to nearer to the population control target.   An  overwhelming  majority of  such operations are performed on women who have already given birth to three , four or more children and have reached the menopause stage. Men, notoriously, account for a mere five percent of  total number of sterilisation operations, according to the available  surveys published in the quarterly journal of the National Institute of  Health and family Welfare .

Reports of  botched up sterilization operations at ad hoc camps run by some NGOs in Bihar (The Hindu , 23 January) , Madhya Pradesh (The Times of  India 18 and 26 February) are not  infrequent. Incentive -driven  motivators and target chasing administrators in Madhya  Pradesh  went on a sterilization spree in February this year to lure  poor  tribals even though they are  designated as “protected”  because their numbers are dwindling fast. From  aanganwadi workers to patwaris and  tehsildars and other officials everyone was out to lure tribals to sterilization  tables for a cash incentive of  Rs 1100, according to the president of the Vanwasi  Kalyan  Parishad who alleged that the Gonds and Korku  tribals in Betul district were the victims of  this drive. Stung by the protests, state chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan  had to step in ,  warning  unscrupulous operatives to not defeat the real objective of  celebrating 2012 as the year of family planning  in the state.

Such incidents may be aberrations and the vast majority of operations – at the annual rate of  40 to 50 lakhs over the last three years and still rising – are safe and successful, according to health ministry officials. Yet the central fact remains that the vast majority of such operations are redundant as they are conducted on people who have already reached their non-reproductive age.

 Time to re-focus family planning  strategy.  And  time to relocate  existing and new Plan finances  to pay ASHA a meaningful wage commensurate with the services we expect of her.

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

India’s Reserve Bank fared better than US Fed, says US Nobel economist

By Subhash Chopra

India’s banks  weathered  the 2008 global financial meltdown sparked by the excessive lending  spree  by the likes of Lehman Brothers  better than US and European banks, according to Joseph Stiglitz, the US Nobel  Prize winner economist.
Excessive lending in the US housing  market and excessive freedom to investment bankers in US and Europe  led to the crash under whose impact the Western economies are still reeling. In contrast the Indian banking system did much better because  the bankers were kept under a moderately tight leash and  restrained from reckless and speculative lending deals.

India’s central bank, RBI (Reserve Bank of India) like its counterparts in China and Brazil, had done much better than the US Federal Reserve or the European Central Bank(ECB) because it had, and continues to have, less independence than its US or European counterparts which had much more independence  that lprovided excessive bailouts to  banks  which indulged in speculative deals and brought  the  entire  system  down on its knees.
Greater independence for central banks was neither desirable nor conducive to any better  economic performance, rather the reverse.  Above all it lacked accountability, said Stiglitz.

The crisis had shown that one of the central principles advocated by Western central bankers -- the desirability of central bank independence  -- was "questionable" at best. "In this crisis, countries with less independent central banks -- China, India and Brazil  -- did far, far better than countries with more independent central banks -- Europe and the United States. There is no such thing as truly independent institutions. All public institutions are accountable, and the only quetion is to whom."  

 In the run-up to the financial crisis, the US  Federal Reserve was accountable only to Wall Street, he said and singled out New York Fed President William Dudley for some especially harsh criticism.  Dudley was "a model of bad governance" because of his inherent conflict of interest: he bailed out the very banks he was supposed to regulate – the very same banks that enabled him to gain his position,.
“ The (granting of ) loans by the Fed and the ECB to banks at low interest rates was, in effect a , a gift worth tens of billions of dollars, a gift from the public, but which circumvented the usual public appropriations process. It is unconscionable that such power over the purse be given to an-elected body,” Stiglitz  asserted. America’s central bank, he believed , had been captured by the Wall Street. “It (the Fed) came to reflect the ideology and interests of the financial sector which it was supposed to regulate.” The conflicts of  interest – as unravelled in cases like the New York Fed – were “a model of bad governance.” The Fed, he said, had “turned a blind eye to practices that not only exploited the poor, but put into jeopardy the American and global financial system.”
Interestingly, the US Nobel Laureate’s  onslaught on the independence of central banks came right after RBI governor D.  Subbarao’s  address urging more independence  for central banks. They were speaking at the C.D.Deshmukh memorial lecture in Mumbai..
The RBI governor also called for greater harmony between fiscal and monetary policy to tackle the challenges of growth and unemployment  “The central banks alone cannot fix economies by themselves. Governments need to act too from the fiscal side , and monetary and fiscal policies have to act in harmony.” His remarks came a a tie when he is under pressure from industry and the government to bring down interest rates ahead of his monetary policy announcement later this month.
Continuing his Indian tour, Stiglitz  waded into another controversy about the role of FDI (foreign direct investment ) by multinationals like Walmart in India. Speaking at the Azam Premji Foundation in Bangaluru, he cautioned  over the belief that FDI was some kind of panacea. There was no shortage of cash or entrepreneurship in India  The country should look at what foreign investment  can do that Indian entrepreneurs cannot do. Walmart , he warned, could bring greater capacity in bribery as it did  in Mexico. “You don’t want to bring that in, you already have enough of it.”
He said that he had studied Walmart’s supply systems  in other countries. They had not worked there. FDI with its large buying power could control a large part of the market and drive prices down to bring in cheaper Chinese goods and increase dependence on foreign goods.
Overall Stiglitz was fairly optimistic about India weathering the global slowdown in the coming year when the US and other economies were expected to slow down. “Good thing about India is that it is less dependent on exports.”

26/11 and the shame of Indian intelligence bunglers

By Subhash Chopra
The facts behind the conviction of David Coleman Headley (alias Daood Gilani) and Tahawwur  Hussain Rana by a Chicago court on terror related charges  concerning  26/11 events in India and Denmark have thrown up a host of questions. Highly charged Indian media and political players have been crying hoarse over the betrayal by the US for not cooperating with India by holding back on information about Headley and Rana  and then adding  insult to injury by refusing to extradite  the pair of  them.
But what   about the intelligence of various Indian intelligence agencies and their functioning over the recent years leading up to the Mumbai carnage of 26/11, 2008? What were these  highly paid, rarely questioned , far less answerable  than any other set of functionaries doing  all this time? Enjoying all the perks and taking it easy at the poor citizen’s expense ? Expecting America’s CIA and other agencies to do their work in the name of cooperation?
Headley(Gilani),  son of a Pakistani national and an American woman and a self-confessed India -hater , visited India several times  for three years from September 2006 to July 2008. After spending his impressionable years in Pakistan following his parents’ divorce,  he joined his mother in America when he was 17, helping her to run her 'Khyber Pass' bar for some time.He himself is said to be thrice married and divorced, the latest from his Moroccan wife with whom he spent their honeymoon at the Taj hotel in Mumbai.

Headley(Gilani), an old school friend of  Pakistani army deserter Rana , was running  an immigration facilitation agency  (racket)  for US and Canada visa seekers  in Mumbai’s AC Market in Tardeo for all these years as a cover for  his anti-Indian activities in collusion with Lashkar-e-Tayyeba(LeT) and  his other masters  in Pakistan who unleashed the 26/11 assault on Mumbai. He set up his  dummy immigration office on a so-called licence  from Rana’s  Immigration Law Centre in Chicago. He even visited cities like Agra, Ahmedabad  and Kochi, ostensibly  to interview visa hopefuls or, more likely, potential recruits for  his grand plan.
All this while he not only carried out  reconnaissance  of all the targets, including  hotels like the Taj on several  occasions, but also videographed  the places providing details to his handlers in Pakistan for  attacks on individual buildings.
Headley(Gilani) moved in and out of India all those years without raising the slightest of suspicion among the Indian intelligence operatives. Even after 26/11 he paid another visit in 2009, probably to gloat over his mission’s success!
Indian agencies bungled the intelligence supplied by the US agencies who had given two specific tip-offs. In September 2008 the US agencies warned of a possible attack on targets in Mumbai , followed days later by another tip-off about a possible  coastal or maritime attack. Indian authorities  took up the second tip-off and strengthened coastline security but called off the patrols on November 20,  just six days before 26/11, according to one report.

Could there be a bigger bungle? What about the intelligence of these bunglers?

With television channels in the vanguard, Indian intelligence agencies and political parties are crying betrayal by the US for not extraditing Headley(Gilani) and Rana  to India. Why are they  not baying for their own  intelligence bunglers? Shouldn’t some  top heads roll even at this late hour after all the tragedy, shameful neglect and total incompetence?
 ...................................................................

My Hitch-Hiking Passage to England & Back and Forth


We were two young reporters who resigned their jobs on two New Delhi newspapers and decided to hitch-hike to London – but not the usual rough style all the way to Britain. Rathnakar Kini from The Patriot and myself from The Indian Express chose to be fairly respectable travellers up to Tehran (when we ran out of all our cash). We didn’t hitch-hike through Pakistan either. In 1964 we simply could not. It was out of the question for two Indians who were also journalists from the neighbouring “friendly” country. The very visa conditions ruled out any such possibility. We were to travel specifically by bus from the Indian border to Lahore and by rail from Lahore to Quetta and out to Zahidan in Iran – all in one week. We did it in six days.
We left New Delhi like two mad dogs in the mid-day sun of a burning May day and arrived the next day at the India-Pakistan border post of Wagah by an excellent steam train of the Indian Railways. Crossing the border under the scorching sun and lugging our respectable but clumsy baggage (a suitcase and a shoulder bag each) we sweated our mile-long walk to the first Pakistani bus stop. Lahore, the city of my birth and a thousand memories, was only 18 miles away.
Once on the bus we passed along plentiful farms and bustling small town markets. A burqa-clad (veiled) woman with nail-polished young figures clambered on to our bus at one stop and then another – an unveiled fresh face this time – hopped into our single decker. Soon the bus rolled parallel to some factory walls bearing a series of sprawling signs and slogans in big bold painted letters in English  some of which read:

FIRST DESERVE, THEN DEMAND
WORK IS A MORAL NECESSITY

THINK SLOW, ACT QUICK


Unable to read English, most Pakistanis blessedly ignored it.

A few minutes later we reached Lahore railway station terminus. Unlike the greasy Old Delhi railway station of the Indian capital, Lahore station was a neat place. The traffic policeman at the road junction was dressed in spotless whites and carried a well-polished helmet on his head. Efficiency seemed writ large on the face of the city where people seemed to fear not only God but also authority.

Only the coffee house on the Mall remained unreformed. Its lower middle class customers (and some middle class addicts too) were openly critical of the working of their world and could be heard to demand a good deal more than what they were told they deserved. They talked about military rule and nepotism among the top brass and at least one of them was overheard to be praising India’s Mahatma Gandhi, anathema to most Pakistanis – thanks to the fanatical and often martial fingures on the keyboards of Pakistan’s press and book printing industry. Places like the Mall coffee house were shunned by the middle class and the upper crust who preferred Gymkhana clubs and other rendezvous where they drank whatever they pleased to the health of those in power. Unlike in General Zia-ul-Haq’s days, liquor flowed freely under General Ayub Khan’s Presidency.

After a couple of days’ stay in Lahore we took the train to Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s south-western border province of Baluchistan which has remained in a state of perpetual rebellion since the British days long before the birth of Pakistan. We covered the 800-mile distance between the two provincial capitals in just 24 hours despite a number of stops on the way. Faster trains were being planned for the future and new tracks, we were told, were being laid.

Paradoxically, perhaps the slowest train in the world was also in Pakistan. It was the weekly train from Quetta to Zahidan in Iran doing about 450 miles in a little over 50 hours. It passed through the deserts of Baluchistan where the railway tracks quite often get buried under the moving sands.

The tracks may be weak; but the people are sturdy. They jump on and off the trains at will. When a Pakistani co-traveller once asked a stripling teenager about his ticket because the ticket inspector was approaching, the little spark snapped back: “Hum azad hain (we are a free people)”. And he jumped off the running train, disappearing into the desert.

We reached Zahidan, our first halt in Iran, a little after midnight. The train stopped in the middle of a sandy expanse where taxis seemed to park right beside the train windows. It looked like a railway station without a platform, but we knew later that plans were ready for a complete transformation of the scene.

Our first impression of  Zahidan as some railyard wilderness was soon corrected when our cab moved along the well illuminated and tree-lined avenues like Khiaban-i-Pahlavi (then named after the old Shah’s dynasty – most probably after some other name now.

The school examination season was on. Books in hand the students paced up and down the well-lit street roundabouts or sat under the neon lights. Young Iran seemed to be awake in search of education.

Strolling out into the main shopping area during the day we caught sight of yard-long naans (leavened eastern bread) — naan bakeries are spread throughout the country and the practice of baking bread at home – at least in the towns – seemed to be non-existent. It was a refreshing change from the Indian and Pakistani practice of condemning women to the time wasting practice of making endless chapattis on tavas (hot iron plates) or baking rotis with hand dives into the burning tandoors (clay ovens). And quite unlike that Anglo-Saxon  invention of sliced bread, the naans tasted simply delicious.

About two days of endless bus travel, partly paid for by some of our wayside hosts, brought us to Tehran where we found free-of-charge sleeping floor space for five nights at the local Sikh temple or gurdwara known there as Masjid-i-Hind (the Indian mosque) which was also host to a New Zealander, a German and two English men besides another two Indians like us.

Our fellow guests included Christians, Muslims and Hindus (you don’t have to be a Sikh to be able to enjoy the gurdwara’s hospitality).

A visit to the Department of English at Tehran University next day proved our salvation from impending financial disaster. We had nearly finished all our cash before reaching Tehran — two-thirds of our journey still lay ahead! Once at the university, we introduced ourselves to a final year student of English, a Mr. Arma, who, though himself in a hurry, passed us on to two fellow students – Parvez Nikfarjam and Mohammad Babajanzadeh, the unspoilt man from the East.

We talked about our travels, our writings, about English literature, about India and about Iran till the lunch hour when they offered to take us to their university dining hall. The first lunch was followed by an endless operation hospitality over the next four days. They almost overfed us with continuous lunches, dinners, drives to Shamira and other spots, and rounds of coffee, beeakerfuls of tea and ice creams. Many a time Babajanzadeh threatened displeasure if we didn’t agree to yet another round of his favoured delicacies.

Financial despondence gave way to confidence and big city bewilderness to beauty and affinity. Tehran at once started looking beauteous where old and new, East and West appeared to meet.

Here was old world leisure with people sipping tea and smoking winding silvery hookahs (hubble bubble pipes) in restaurants. India’s betel chewing, lazy Lucknow seemed to have lost its prime of place in the leisure hierarchy of the Eastern world.

Here were statues of Shaikh Saadi, Omar Khayyam and Ferdaus – all standing on the important cross-roads of this Eastern city gone West. The all-you-want Ferdausi super store had escalators to take you up its various sections while the Plasco market tried to cast its own 19-storey spell on those who had the money to spend.

The temper of the place was Eastern, the material modes European. In those pre-Khoemeni days most town women wore no veil (chador) — some were out in their long eastern trousers and some in skirts. Was it East or West? Was this the heaven of which poet Ferdaus had once said:

“Gar bar rooh-e-zamin ast
Hamin ast. Hamin ast. Hamin ast.”
or in translation
“If ever it (heaven) is on this earth,
It’s here. It’s here. It’s here.”

However, our journalistic suspicions wouldn’t rest. We started to find out about the so-called White Revolution launched by the Emperor Reza Shah II, since deposed for his Western ways and later to die in exile. As a first step big estates were being broken up and, we were told, nobody was to be allowed to hold more than 500 hectares of land or own complete villages. Ultimately even these holdings were to face a break-up, releasing land for the tillers. But having watched the failure of Gandhian Bhoodan (gift of land) and other reforms in India we remained sceptics. The big farmers and estate owners, in their turn were being given shares in the nascent industry as compensation for the loss of their lands. When I asked whether this process was not a mere substitution of rural landlordism with the more powerful urban proprietorship, two prominent members of the Majlis (national parliament) simply brushed aside the question with an evasive smile.

One major issue on which the official attitude displayed conspicuous reticence was the historical role of the former anti-Western, anti-Royalist and leftist Premier Mossadiq, still the unforgotten here of vast sections of intelligentsia, who launched Iran on the road to nationalisation of her oil resources.

But the most encouraging of the sights to be seen was in the villages where the Shah’s new Literacy Corps (made up of school and university graduates) was engaged in teaching adults and children in the use of the three Rs and rural aids. Despite bureaucratic gaps, the beginnings were earnest and people eager to learn. It was this grassroot revolution which seemed to be at the root of the unrest of the late 1970s. Education always leads to collision with authority, however benevolent its intentions.

After full five days in Tehran we had a farewell lunch given by our student hosts who in yet another bout of generosity bought us tickets up to Tabriz, the western provincial capital. The train moved on as we looked backwards with fond memories.

Our next halt was Tabriz and our hosts once again were local students. We had only to spot one of them in the city’s student quarter, and lunches, dinners, rounds of tea and introductions to new friends followed. Language was no barrier. A bit of English; a few words of Persian and Bharat Natyam (Indian signs and gestures) were quite adequate for most occasions.

A couple of days later, we stood on the Turkish side of Iran’s border watching the snow-capped Arsar mountains less than five crow miles towards the old Soviet border.

With about three Turkish liras (less than an old English shilling or an Indian rupee) in our pockets the pair of us stood on the Turkish hilltop surveying all the miles left behind and many more to come. A few more hours’ journey after selling one of my shirts and a pair of sun glasses brought us to a little Turkish town called Agri where with the help of a police officer we managed to get into a truck bound for Erzurum. Sun down, our new vehicle started with an odd load of two horses and two journalists at the back, and the driver and his mate at the front.

The machine moved on through the high mountain roads under thick, dark clouds relieved occasionally by either natural lightning or the radar lights on hilltops signifying America’s “vigil for democracy” or Turkey’s “sell-out to American dollars” as the opponent camp would put it.

Another day, another donor. We were soon in Erzincan where we stumbled into a certain Kemal Poutre who entertained us to a delicious, hot meal and promised us a night’s free rest at his hotel besides arranging a lift to Ankara the next morning. But our luck ran out. Kemal’s boss turned up at the hotel and we soon realised that he was being generous at the expense of his hotel proprietor. In fact, Kemal was mortally afraid even to talk to us after his chief’s arrival.

We reached Ankara, the capital city of seven hills, on a cloudy, dripping morning with less than the price of a couple of cups of tea between the two of us. But we had never given up hope of striking some ever new source of human goodwill. And strike we did.

We spent our last few coins on phoning Abid Hussain, an Indian community development expert ( later India’s Ambasador to the USA) whose services had been loaned to Turkey via the United Nations and whose address we had picked up from his younger brother at India Coffee House in New Delhi. We had never met him in our life. With great trepidation, we phoned Mr. Hussain.

He straight away welcomed us. We raced through Kennedy Cadessi to Kedar Sokagi where we found Mrs. Abid Hussain beckoning to us a welcome from her balcony as if we were some long lost friends. For full five days the Hussains treated us to unforgettable hospitality that combined the best traditions of Hyderabad in South India with those of Lucknow in the North.

But like all good things it had to end and we were soon on way to Istanbul.

It was about 1 a.m. on the 25th day of our travels that we entered Europe by ferry across the Bosphorus. Landing in the “European” part of Istanbul, we lodged for three nights at what was known as the American hostel, the hub of European hitch-hikers’ area.

We had our first small glimpse of Europe in the hostel baths where a number of young men were washing their naked bodies while women cleaners scrubbed some of the empty cubicles without even batting an eyelid at the sight of the male nudes.

Istanbul the city of the Golden Horn, the Blue Mosque, St. Sophia’s Church and other landmarks was as impressive as it was fabled to be despite its modern municipal administrators or their bosses who perpetually blamed cash shortages for the old city’s unkempt look. A strange meeting place of the West and the East, Istanbul looked overwhelmed by the tourists who neither loved the place nor were loved by those who belonged to the place.

And like the tourist flotsom and jetsom we too had our transient contact with Istanbul on way to other pastures.

Dogged by our eternal shortage of funds we sped towards the Greek border. Crossing Turkey at Edirne, we passed through a new hamlet bearing a hoary old name — Nea  Orestia — a modernist reminder of the great days of ancient Greek drama! Whether the village had any greater link with the past than its half name (Orestia) was highly doubtful.

Back on the road we found ourselves surprised when a police patrol car stopped by us — not so much to ask for our passports but to offer us a ride in response to our thumb signs! It was a short ride but we soon hopped into an inter-continental lorry and were glad to be racing along the coast to Alexandropolis, beauteous Cavala with its cobbled central square, and on to Thessaloniki. Food, drink, climate — all were ideal. But our finances were too precarious to let us have any taste of Greece. We could only promise ourselves to return to these places in better times.

Onward to the Yugoslav border. We thought ourselves lucky to have hitched a ride with another inter-continental lorry driver who promised to take us up to Skopje. But he changed his mind half-way on seeing two girl hitch-hikers. He simply ordered us to take the back seats and vacate the front seats next to him for the girls. Soon he made it clear to us that he would be dropping us two males at the next major town, taking with him only the two pretty ones for the rest of the journey. But the lecher lost his prize when, almost out of the blue, his boss turned up and changed his route probably diverting the lorry consignment to some other customer. The driver dropped all four of us. Crest fallen he took the lonely road while we walked away with the girls -- at least for a few minutes. They were rich enough to pay their fares and soon took a train to Beograd (Belgrade). We soldiered on with hitching ever more rides.

A couple of days and a few hundred kilometers later we found ourselves standing at a dusty spot on the road to Beograd looking hungrily at the ripe cherries in an orchard across the highway. There appeared a young farmer dragging his bike like a donkey; he saw us, waved a cheer at us and conquered us. He asked us where we came from. We replied: “India, Nehru, India” and, to jog his free association of words or stream of consciousness, we added: “Nehru, Tito, Nasser.” It clicked. We had conquered the language barrier. He understood we had come from a non-aligned country that, like his own, sought a world full of peace, undominated by big powers something that trinity of those names appeared to symbolise.

Peasants may be unlettered but they are canny in their judgment of humanity. For the next three hours the farmer became our host entertaining us to a lunch of omlette, cheese, beautiful bread and a bottle of some most potent stuff. It was a knockout! Literally, for one of us at least. My mate Kini was legless.

Shortly afterwards we re-posted ourselves on the road to Beograd and sure enough a single ride in a Swiss engineer’s car brought us right to the centre of the national capital well before the day was out. The evening proved desultory. We neither had enough money nor wanted a proper meal — the farmer’s hospitality was still fresh in our system. The air was warm and we roamed the streets and the parks, finally coming to the central railway station waiting rooms for the night’s shelter. But that was not to be! A railway policeman arrived and served quit orders on every one without a ticket for some next train. We joined the unlucky band and came out of the station. But all was not lost. The railway station’s pavement chairs offered a welcome rest to the drop-out brigade. There was no state police chasing us or any other person.

The next day dawned and after a lot of idle wandering we chanced our luck with a visit to the Indian Embassy where we were offered by the Press Counsellor a hot cup of tea and a bath – both very welcome! The Counsellor, Mr. Mahajan, also gave us the telephone number of the only Indian journalist then working in the Yugoslav capital. It was a most lucky strike for a whole week’s hospitality and stay in Beograd where we also met two equally generous young painters from India. The city itself held a charm of its own – a hearty people visibly exuding relaxation and joy that blew through the city, its Kale Maigden park and the banks of the Sava river.

A week was soon over and it was time to say farewell to Beograd and our Indian friends who bought us tickets up to Trieste. The train rolled on and before long we were the guests of a Yugoslav engineer who feted us with brimful glasses of beautiful, bubbling beer – making it another unforgettable evening of humour (he spoke very good English) and hospitality. The Yugoslavs (in Marshal Tito’s days) were certainly not living by bread alone!

The train trundled on till we stopped in Trieste where our rail tickets expired. Once on the coast road, its heavenly scenery banished all thoughts of our financial precariousness and by the evening of the same day we were in Venice watching other people enjoying gondola rides and meals in St. Mark’s Square.

We also watched the pigeons in the square. Venice quickly joined other places on our list to be visited in better circumstances!

Onward  soldiers, we hitched rides as fast as we could and within two days we had raced on to Milan, Turin, and crossing the Alps and lot of French territory, to Grenobles, Lyons and Paris itself.

After a disastrous meeting between my mate Kini and his patron uncle (from his native Indian town who had been working as a correspondent of a major Indian newspaper in Paris for some years we decided to look up a painter friend (acquaintance, in fact) whose address we carried with us.

Standing a short distance from the Notre Dame cathedral by the Seine we asked a bystander for guidance towards Rue de Austerlitz where our painter friend once lived. The Frenchman knew English and seemed to be posted there by providence to help us. He beckoned us to follow him down to a car park, took out his car and drove us to Rue de Austerlitz where he went to the hotel (pension) reception to find if our painter friend was there. No, our painter friend was not there. He hadn’t been there for a long time and had left no forwarding address.

The Frenchman came out of the hotel and asked us where we planned to spend the night. “Under one of Seine’s bridges”, I replied. “Oh, no. That can’t be”, he said as he stood and scratched his head for a moment. He speedily swung back to the hotel, asking us to wait a while. He returned and told us he had paid for a room for us for the night and hastily pushed some money into my pocket for dinner and morning’s coffee. “Welcome to France”, he said and simply disappeared!

Next morning, through the Indian Embassy we traced our painter friend who introduced us to another two friends who between themselves took to feeding us and entertaining us as if we were really some old mates!

After four days, I had to put Paris on my list of places to be visited in more prosperous times. I took the road to Calais and exactly on the 46th day of my travels from New Delhi I reached England after a midnight boat crossing from Calais to Dover.
And there begins another story. That was my first passage to England.   Later it was back to India (though not by hitch-hiking because of security reasons) and then to England again. Since those days it continues to be back forth -- an abiding affair between my two worlds.